Access a range of articles and resources written by clinical governance experts and search our carefully curated list of safety and quality journal articles and reports.
AICG articles, resources and curated journals and reports are available to all AICG members. Members must be logged in, in order to access all content. Users who are not AICG members will only be able to access publicly available articles.
The Excellent Care Framework is aligned with Safer Care Victoria’s’ Clinical Governance Framework and the Victorian Department of Health and Human Service’s Quality Governance Framework for Community Services.
This Mission Australia Framework provides guidance to all levels of the organisation to deliver services aligned to standards for safe quality care in Australia. Specifically about child and family, youth, aged care, disability, homelessness, mental health and alcohol and other drug services.
Anglicare’s Clinical & Care Governance Framework is based on the fundamental principles of clinical governance.
This guidance document sets out a high-level framework for clinical governance in health and disability services in New Zealand.
Service and Clinical Governance is everyone's business. This framework guides all stakeholders in understanding their roles and responsibilities.
The NDIS Independent Advisory Council’s (the Council) paper ‘choice and control to safely live a good life of belonging and citizenship’ recognises the system-wide focus on improving supports for people with disability who are at risk of harm. In response to this paper, the NDIA committed to developing a NDIA Participant Safeguarding Policy (Policy) to guide and enhance the way the NDIA works with NDIS participants and people with disability.
Just because people may be older and potentially frailer doesn't mean that decision-making should be taken away from them. Use this facilitator guide to support discussion about dignity of risk in aged care.
Dignity of risk is another way of saying you have the right to live the life you choose, even if your choices involve some risk.
This article addresses the question of to what extent changes in legislation and regulatory standards in aged care and disability create new expectations of these boards and directors.
This article examines what might be learnt from both literatures and considers what findings might – and might not – be hypothesised to be transferable to the governance of disability service providers.
