Resources

Home/Resources/Don’t rely on your incident reporting systems to count incidents

Don’t rely on your incident reporting systems to count incidents

Don’t rely on your incident reporting systems to count incidents

Many hospitals continue to use incident reporting systems (IRSs) as their primary patient safety data source. The information IRSs collect on the frequency of harm to patients [adverse events (AEs)] is generally of poor quality, and some incident types (e.g. diagnostic errors) are under-reported. Other methods of collecting patient safety information using medical record review, such as the Global Trigger Tool (GTT), have been developed. The aim of this study was to undertake a systematic review to empirically quantify the gap between the percentage of AEs detected using the GTT to those that are also detected via IRSs.

Sign in to continue reading

This page requires an active AICG membership, please login below to continue reading. If you are not an AICG member you can register below.

AICG Member login
Not a member? Register now

AICG Membership provides access to exclusive resources and articles as well as free registration to select events.

Become part of a community that is committed to improving safety and quality across health and care sectors.